Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1701 - 1720 of 7,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm by David S. Jones
Citizenship and Immigration Service has provided additional guidance on the implementation of the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 10:44 am by Florian Mueller
The document doesn't state any reasons: 15-11-19 CAFC Denial of Samsung v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:34 am by Fong & Aquino
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court recently decided United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:34 am by Fong & Aquino
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
It stated as follows- "the applicant's handbags; vanity cases (not fitted), briefcases, articles of luggage, wallets, purses (not of precious metal or coated therewith), leather shoulder belts; bags; sporrans; credit card holders; card holders; key holders (in class 18) are similar to a low degree to the opponent's clothing (in class 25). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Cory J. Fox
  H.B. 232 does not apply to any person or entity subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, any person or entity subject to HIPAA, or any Kentucky agencies, local governments, or political subdivisions. [read post]