Search for: "State v. I. A. A." Results 1701 - 1720 of 84,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
“We conclude that neither Article I, §2, nor the Equal Protection Clause, nor (what appellants only fleetingly invoke) Article I, §4, provides a judicially enforceable limit on the political considerations that the States and Congress may take into account when districting,” Justice Scalia wrote. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:38 pm
So, I was expecting that Ginsburg might take the opportunity to correct that historical oversight with a concurring opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:04 pm by Daniel Solove
In a previous post, I analyzed the intrusion upon seclusion claim in Snyder v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:08 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Monday, CAAF released it’s fourth opinion of the term in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:53 am
As best I can tell, in most states, no. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 7:57 am by Eric Goldman
Most of the recent cases also involve pro se plaintiffs, and I think the online-service-as-state-actor issue is too big and complicated for pro se success. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 12:46 pm by John McFarland
I, § 19 (“No citizen of this State shall be deprived of … property … except by the due course of the law of the land. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
  At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am by brian
The minimum prison term for the offense described in §924(c) is five years,§924(c)(1)(A)(i), in addition to "any other term of imprisonment imposed on the [offender]," §924(c)(1)(D)(ii). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Not the way I would have done it, but we all have our own style.On the same conference list, presenting largely the same issues, is United States v. [read post]