Search for: "State v. London"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
“, Turing Lecture Theatre, IET, London Savoy Place, Savoy Place, London WC2R 0BL 26 February 2018, “Global Internet and Jurisdiction Conference,” Ottawa, Canada. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm
For press release, see ECtHR Press Release R (SSHD) v HM Coroner for Inner West London [2010] EWHC 3098 (Admin) 30 Nov 2010. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:24 am
Regarding the first factor, whether other judges had held alternative interpretations of the same language to be reasonable, the plaintiffs relied on two Kentucky cases, London v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
Each contract was governed by English law and contained an arbitration clause requiring arbitration pursuant to the rules and procedures of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
In essence, that would be to undo virtually the entire modern “regulatory state. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Thus on 1 April, two large demonstrations took place in the City of London. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 10:48 pm
New London, in which the Court upheld a city's use of eminent domain for economic development purposes under the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:01 am
Plaintiffs in the federal Atlantic Yards eminent domain case were rejected in June 2008, though one justice, the conservative Samuel Alito stated that he would've granted the petition.As I wrote at the time, a decision to reject does not mean that the cases below were decided correctly, just that the appeal didn't present enough issues of law--conflicts in the interpretation of the Supreme Court's highly contested 6/23/05 Kelo v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm
” However, the facts of the CJEU case cited in support of this proposition, Marinari v Lloyds Bank (1995), concerned a series of events which took place in Manchester, culminating in the claimant’s arrest by the police in England, ver [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
R (Joseph) v LB Newham [2008] EWHC 1637 (Admin) Blanket policies are unlawful. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
Having considered the earlier judgment of Mustill J (as he then was), in Finelvet AG v Vinava Shipping Co Ltd (The Chrysalis) [1983] 2 All E.R. 658, he stated that “it is very doubtful that the court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from arbitrators on questions of fact, even if the parties were to agree to such an appeal. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:14 am
Based on London v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
See Landrigan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 9:58 am
’); State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
