Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 1701 - 1720 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm by Larry Munn
The fact that the Salt story involves restaurants in Vancouver and Toronto is also of interest, given that we are waiting to hear how the Supreme Court of Canada will rule in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v… [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
The federal anti-dilution law mandates that a mark must be so widely known to everyone across the United States as to be in the category of “famous” marks. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 2:35 am
But the Fourth Amendment itself imposes these costs, in this Monday's National Law Journal: June 19 marks the 50th anniversary of Mapp v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
 The owner stated, “It wastes time to fight back. [read post]