Search for: "State v. Mitchell"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
Both cases also involved the quite rare interlocutory review of denial of motions to dismiss—such review is almost never granted except where defendant claims some special immunity from suit [Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:44 am
(United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm
The Crown attempted to rely on Justice Binnie’s holding in Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
” Soldo v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
In a case we discussed recently, here, Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
On the one hand, consider the broad general language of the Supreme Court in Mitchell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
Mitchell, 31 Fla. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
Michael V. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:56 pm
However, a recent Wisconsin Court of Appeals case, Karsten v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:56 pm
However, a recent Wisconsin Court of Appeals case, Karsten v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:58 pm
So held the Virginia Supreme Court on November 12, 2015, in Kambis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:10 am
Factual Background In Eagle v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:18 am
The court, however, dismissed the employee’s sex discrimination claim, finding it duplicative of his hostile work environment claim (Rachuna v Best Fitness Corp, May 5, 2014, Mitchell, R). [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am
Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
