Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2016, 10:01 pm
According to Sturgeon R-V School District Superintendent Shawn Schultz, three of those cases involve school children, one of whom was a first-grader who was infected before the school year got underway. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 2:35 am
A state’s duties under the Convention to a refugee reaching a particular territory for whose international relations the state is responsible are in principle and in normal circumstances limited to providing and securing the refugee’s Convention rights in that context [89]. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
The Board also distinguished AT&T Mobile v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:31 pm
Comm’r of Taxes of Vermont, 445 U.S. 425 (1980). [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
In R(Hamid) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3070 (Admin) [not on Baili yet, but apparently on Lawtel], the Divisional Court signalled its intention to get much tougher on out of hours administrative court applications to the duty Judge. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
R. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says the effect of the Lord President’s language is to consider what is a proper political purpose. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 8:21 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
R on the application of Hope and Glory Public House v City of Westminster Magistrates Court [2011] EWCA Civ 31 Read judgement It was not unfair in terms of Article 6 to require of a party aggrieved by a licensing decision to bear the responsibility of persuading the court hearing the appeal that the original decision was wrong. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
From Parents Defending Education v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2010] EWHC 907 (Admin) Or when is a child in need not a child in need? [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2010] EWHC 907 (Admin) Or when is a child in need not a child in need? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:16 am
R (CLIENTEARTH) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT FOOD & RURAL AFFAIRS, Court of Appeal 30 May 2012, on appeal from Mitting J, 13 December 2011, A newsflash, really, confirming that ClientEarth’s claim for a declaration and mandatory order against Defra in respect of air pollution was refused by the Court of Appeal, in line with the judgment below. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
It is entitled to have regard to them in assessing needs (R v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:59 pm
By Gerald R. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Kevin R. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am
:”Applying R. v. [read post]
