Search for: "State v. Square" Results 1701 - 1720 of 5,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am by Stephen Wermiel
For the lawyers who square off in the oral argument, the stakes will be of enormous importance to their respective states. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
The United States Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari in Iancu v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Brazilian Blowout revised its position stating their products contained less than 0.2 percent formaldehyde, levels deemed safe for cosmetic use—a statement in line with the 2005 formaldehyde evaluation.) [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Ronald Mann
Robbins (1997), in which the Court deferred to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, or was prohibited by the intervening decision in United States v Mead Corporation (2001). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am by Nicholas Bronni
Nicholas Bronni serves as the solicitor general for the state of Arkansas, which co-authored an amicus brief joined by 14 other states supporting the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]