Search for: "State v. Superior Court" Results 1701 - 1720 of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 12:14 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
Rebus LLC, 2006 WL 247114 (Jan. 12, 2006), the Superior Court issues sanction for obstruction in discovery. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"Superior court" is defined as the Supreme Court or a County Court (see CPL 10.10 [2]). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:28 pm by Staff
REDUCED to Hindering Prosecution – Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) (discussed in this blog post). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by Jacqueline Ponder
The State of Indiana filed a protective order in March 2011 asking the Marion Superior Court to block IBM’s attempts to take the deposition of Governor Mitch Daniels in the IBM-Indiana litigation regarding IBM’s $1.37 billion contract to modernize the state’s welfare system. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Our bad.The second, issued minutes later, in State Farm v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
   In any event, the overturned Diodoro Superior Court panel opinion  includes an overview of various court decisions that have addressed the possession issue, including the following useful passage:    "The Eighth Circuit also held that merely viewing an image without knowing it is being saved does not constitute 'possession' or even 'receipt.'   In United States… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
” Upon review by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Superior Court’s decision was reversed. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:02 am by A. Jennings Stone, III
The petition asked that the Supreme Court direct the Superior Court judge who was presiding over its case, The Bank of Nova Scotia v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
On the first point, it is well-settled that, "except in extraordinary circumstances, a federal court should not enjoin a pending state proceeding that is judicial in nature and involves important state interests," see JMM Corp. v. [read post]
Initially, the plaintiffs filed an action in the Pierce County Superior Court for the State of Washington (“Brown I”), alleging state wage law claims on behalf of themselves and a proposed class. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am by Jon Sands
Schriro, Nos. 96-99025, 96-99026, 10-99011 (Reinhardt with Schroeder, dissent by Callahan) --- The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of an Arizona state prisoner's claim that he was ineligible to be executed under Atkins v. [read post]