Search for: "State v. Word" Results 1701 - 1720 of 40,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2008, 12:52 pm
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Dixon v Marchant, handed down yesterday, may, I think, lead to some debate, and not just amongst family lawyers. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:12 am by traceydennis
R (Ghai) v Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (Ramgharia Gurdwara, Hitchin and others intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 59; [2010] WLR (D) 36 “The aims of the provisions of the Cremation Act 1902 were to ensure that cremations were subject to uniform rules throughout the country, to enable the Secretary of State to regulate the manner and places in which cremations were carried out, to require a crematorium to be a building which was appropriately equipped and to ensure that a… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
While the precise words used and the names of the persons to whom they were spoken (and when) must, so far as possible, be set out in the Particulars of Claim if not already contained in the Claim Form (CPR PD 53 para 2.4) the Court confirmed the narrow exception summarised by Sharp J in Freer v Zeb & Ors [2008] EWHC 212 (QB) [31]. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
We are examining the recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in Gantler v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:08 am by David Markus
" The tweet was written in Spanish, with the rough English translation, "Keep f***ing around and I'm gonna make you swallow your bitch words you f***ing whitey milks***tter (that's a homophobic slur). [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:16 am
According to the State of Washington, in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:31 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) After a long discussion of the breadth of the speech restriction involved in the case, Chief Justice Roberts’ majority in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
 The category of commission offenses, in other words, is broader than international law. [read post]