Search for: "States v. State" Results 1701 - 1720 of 258,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2024, 6:07 am by Harrison Blank
United States Philip Bobbitt, A Prudential Way Forward in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'm the primary presenter on three topics: the overruling of Chevron deference in the Loper Bright case (plus a comment on the Corner Post case); the Second Amendment ruling in Rahimi and the statutory ruling on bump stocks in Garland v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Preferred Prescription, Inc. v Health Mgt., 252 AD2d 414,416 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
Edward, Reconsidering the Legacy of New York Times V. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:09 pm by Söğüt Atilla
The Munich Local Division, in addressing the patent infringement claims made by VusionGroup, stated that the relevant claims were not constructed with a sufficient degree of certainty. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm by David Super
  Nothing in Article V grants Congress that power, and it is difficult to see Congress doing so when roughly forty states would have less influence under such a system than under one-state-one vote. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 1:15 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
” Furthermore, it argued the inclusion of gender-identity discrimination in Section 106.10 was required by the Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:25 am by Giles Peaker
On the other costs, the lease clause was identically worded to that in Sella House Ltd v Mears (1988) 21 HLR 147. [read post]