Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
She was trial counsel for Romagoza v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
STEPHEN E. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:13 pm
As Justice Stephen Breyer wrote on behalf of the Court: In our view, the Appointments Clause governs the appointments of all officers of the United States, including those located in Puerto Rico. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
In the case of Gibbons v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:16 am
Supreme Court upheld a criminal ban on "material support" of "terrorism" first placed in the Federal Code in the 1990s.Plaintiffs in Holder v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Green & Joseph Oluwole, Hein v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:19 pm
However, Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher added, any testimony by Zayn Husayn, also known as Abu Zubaydah, would be subject to a national-security review, and it would not resolve the dispute over whether testimony by two CIA contractors who supervised the CIA’s torture program is protected by the “state secrets” privilege – the question at the center of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
In the courts Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm
If she can take the bench the day after her husband’s passing, she can make it to the State of the Union.Justice Stephen G. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
If this were a diversity case, Klaxon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm
Justice Stephen Breyer pressed Jaicomo about the policy implications of his position, stating that under Jaicomo’s reading of the FTCA, a plaintiff could collect damages from both the United States and the employee. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
" PROSECUTOR V. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Rumsfeld as his first Supreme Court case; the details of oral argument before the Supreme Court; understanding the importance of technical knowledge in understanding law, legal arguments and results; serving as Acting Solicitor General of the United States and how the Solicitor General’s office compares to private practice; and teaching law, clerking for Justice Stephen G. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm
There, the Supreme Court upheld a California moratorium on new nuclear power plants within the state until the United States developed a means of disposing of spent nuclear fuel. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:09 pm
The cautionary tale of United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
§ 1182(f), which empowers the president to bar entry of foreign nationals who would be "detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
Others much more qualified than I have analyzed the debate, so see these folks for much meatier, more lawyerly analyses:Orin Kerr, Volokh Conspiracy: "Reflections on the Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am
Sotomayor noted that the INA already includes categorical bars to asylum involving an asylum applicant’s stay in another country prior to seeking asylum in the United States. [read post]
