Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2014, 6:54 am
Rubio v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
Creative elements already present in the underlying work can’t be part of the protectable increment of the derivative work. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:43 pm
But all of this pales in comparison to the Court’s April 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Here Sir Richard provides the raw material, in terms of a brightly-illustrated full colour 227 paragraph judgment, while Aaron provides the write-up. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am
But like most issues in law & economics, the issue is more complex than simply consumer protection. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
That hope wasn’t working out so well. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
My first involvement in such a case was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:54 am
In Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
We summed this kind of litigation up recently in reviewing the first comprehensive law review article on the subject.Now there’s another one.The plaintiffs’ duty-to-supply allegations in Hochendoner v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:09 pm
The court said just about as little as possible in its opinion today in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Fox Broad., 330 F.3d 1170, 1174 (9th Cir. 2003) (“similarities derived from the use of common ideas cannot be protected; otherwise, the first to come up with an idea will corner the market”)“. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm
In Sorrell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm
To understand this case, we need to flashback to 2005, when the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (or BAPCPA) was passed. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
It “conclude[d] that protecting a prescription drug manufacturer from possible liability for its own actions in distributing a product, simply because another participant in the chain of distribution is also expected to act, is inconsistent with UCATA. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:53 pm
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.) [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:39 pm
Minott v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:48 am
Or the upcoming Superman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 11:03 pm
Apple and Ericsson teamed up with others (Microsoft, Sony, BlackBerry, EMC) in 2011 to buy up Nortel's wireless patent portfolio. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
" Spotify AB v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:26 am
SportFuel, Inc. v. [read post]
