Search for: "U.S. v. Rolle"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 2:24 pm
The airlines were seeking to roll back fees charged by the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:47 pm
Earlier this year, the Creating Hope Act of 2011 was introduced in the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
She took the coins to the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:40 am
The California Supreme Court, in its Armendariz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Then the wild and distant seas of jurisprudence where he rolled his island bulk; the undeliverable, nameless perils of the whale; these, with all the attending marvels of a thousand Patentability and Infringement-related sights and sounds, helped to sway me to my wish. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
In March, Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, (picture, below) a former member of the Patents Court, delivered the annual Judicial Studies Board lecture entitled "Open Justice Abound? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am
Next, she heard the door to the (stairwell) open and `[s]omething rolling down the stairs. . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
LawLawLaw includes my observations on trends in technology, IP law (trademarks, domain names, and patents), baseball (long story), and rock 'n' roll (longer story). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
(It was previously named NMA v Brown, for now Gov. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 (1974), and General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
Odom v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
I know y’all, it’s been well over a week since my last entry where I said I’d have this entry ready to roll ”on Monday or Tuesday this coming week” — I’d give you an excuse, but you can probably already guess what it is.1 So can we all just pretend that when I said “this coming week” I meant the week after the week that was actually coming at the time? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
Dukes, No. 10–277, (U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:36 am
Dukes v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 331 (1986). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
As my rejoinder was meant to suggest, the idea that some prominent "media outlet" is going to find the Rakofsky litigation so all-fired important that it launches a Pulitzer-ready investigative series in which it inflicts upon its readers publishes "the entire transcript" of the U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(Excess Copyright) Ontario Court of Appeal opines on technology licences in receivership case: Canrock Ventures LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
Its opinion in the Brown v. [read post]
