Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 9,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
At the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:06 pm
Levine (20) Why wacky warnings matter (10) Vioxx: Mark Lanier’s smears of the Ernst v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 9:55 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
A United States Federal District Court in Texas recently discussed the above in a case. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
In Holding Company of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:04 am
The WTO defense was equally useless: the Board pointed out that the "trademark registration opposition system in the United States provides equal treatment for all opposers and applicants, regardless of their national origin or status in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
§ 1498 (that statute has been used by private parties to establish that they cannot be held liable for infringement for any goods “used or manufactured by or for the United States”). [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 7:38 am
The consideration for the contract is Petitioner’s agreement not to use or register the NAKED trademark for condoms in the United States and Respondent’s agreement not to use or register the NUDE trademark for condoms. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
United States, an immigration case, Chief Justice John Roberts “took issue … with the Trump administration’s stance,” “saying it could make it too easy for the government to strip people of citizenship for lying about minor infractions. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a forum-selection case, and United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
Fund v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:51 pm
See Marks v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Case date: 11 May 2021 Case number: No. 19-1077 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:16 am
Case date: 04 October 2024 Case number: No. 22-1817 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
