Search for: "Wilson v. Wilson" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
We agree with defendant that the court's statements do not amount to a description of the range of the potential sentences but, rather, they constitute impermissible coercion, "rendering the plea involuntary and requiring its vacatur" (People v Fanini, 222 AD2d 1111; see People v Stevens, 298 AD2d 267, 268, lv dismissed 99 NY2d 585; People v Wilson, 245 AD2d 161, 163, lv denied 91 NY2d 946). [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
“Dickie” Scruggs and The Scruggs Law Firm in the case of Wilson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Ed Driscoll
It even has a scene where Wilson gives the brush-off to a young Ho Chi Minh, requesting Vietnam’s independence from France, before spotlighting Wilson’s role in setting the stage for WWII. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
Wilson (08-304), petitioner's reply Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
[He] signed the consent form as `Christian Wilson’ and [said] the marijuana belonged to the driver. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm by Ezra Rosser
The consent decree in Hills v Gautreaux, and the HOPE VI and Moving to Opportunity Programs all pointed towards de-concentration of poverty. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:34 am by Diane Polscer
The Rule encourages settlements by providing a way for a defending party to limit its liability and by forcing plaintiffs to take a hard look at the value of their claims when faced with an Offer of Judgment.However, in Wilson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
The sidebar includes a link to Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:38 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    Living in Revolutionary Times from Clark Wilson: Clark Wilson's Mark Weintraub talks about an article in the scientific journal Nature, which discusses the existence of a rare gene mutation that provides protection against Alzheimer’s disease. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:39 am
  The Court has just issued its opinion, which we’ve uploaded here: safford-v-redding Short holding: the strip search did violate the Fourth Amendment (which surprises me - I thought they’d hold it constitutionally permissible), but because Redding’s assailants, Kerry Wilson, Helen Romero, and Peggy Schwallier, didn’t know under clearly established law at the time that their conduct was illegal, they have qualified immunity and… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by Rachel Price
Rita Wilson v David Murray Blanchett & Grant Edward Burns [2012] NZSC 6 (24 February 2012) The Claimant, Mrs Wilson, had received substantial payments from a company under the control of Mrs Wilson’s father and/or husband, APG Holdings Ltd, which subsequently went into liquidation. [read post]