Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 9:07 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:01 pm
Looking slightly earlier in the ROM dump, I saw: 001d920: 0000 0064 0000 0018 0000 5618 0000 a71c ...d......V..... 001d930: 0000 f700 0001 4281 0000 0000 30aa 552a ......B.....0.U* 001d940: 52a5 294a 5294 a529 4a52 2449 1224 44a9 R.)JR..)JR$I. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:55 am
Here are today's must-reads: 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am
San LLC v Zucker & Kwestel LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 32119(U) August 2, 2012 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 601065/11 Judge: Stephen A. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm
” A close and careful reading of both Madison and Marshall – in particular, Marshall’s opinion for the Court in Gibbons v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:06 am
The Portland City Code states that “[u]nless otherwise provided in this Chapter, closed containers located either within the vehicle or any of the vehicle's compartments will not be opened for inventory purposes. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
As the Court observed in Salinas, “When Congress uses well-settled terminology of criminal law, its words are presumed to have their ordinary meaning and definition. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Employee’s claim that she did not receive notice of disciplinary charges mailed to her rebutted by employer’s evidence of proper mailings Katz v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 2008 NY Slip Op 31935(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] The New York City Board of Education [BOE] sent a “notice of charges” to a tenured teacher. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
Moore, 562 U. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
Moore, 562 U. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
Myers, 461 U. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
Western Sugar Co-op. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:09 am
We have discussed previously the tension between a wide and narrow reading of the CFAA - see Jeffrey's original take on Nosal - Ninth Circuit en banc adopts narrow reading of CFAA, and my analysis of the dissent - Why Nosal’s dissent is surprisingly persuasive.Well, the Fourth Circuit has sided with the "narrow" camp, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
" Hensley, 461 U .S. at 433. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:31 am
The words "suddenly and without warning" refer only to Douglas's perception of events. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
S.2d 138 (1st Dept. 2007). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm
Not one word can be cited. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Newman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
S. 23, 374 U. [read post]
