Search for: "Admin"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 5,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Colorado English professor raises doubts about Admin's handling of Adler, Barnett, and Kaufman cases
21 Nov 2014, 7:34 am
Here. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
New York City Administrative Code 19-190, generally defined as failing to exercise “due care” and violating the right of way of pedestrians and cyclists, is a relatively new statute drafted and passed by New York City. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:25 am
... now that gas prices are the highest on record and the Biden administration is flailing, its approval rating crushed by soaring gas prices and desperately pointing the finger at Putin or any other feces that will stick to the wall, suddenly the president is going for a full U-turn and hoping that everyone has been sufficiently neuralized to forget that on the very first day of his administration, the 79 year old president ordered the closure of the Keystone XL pipeline (in a hilariously titled… [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
via www.youtube.com Yuk. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 11:20 am
If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials might even face prosecution. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:28 am
I told you President Joe Biden’s border executive order did nothing. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 11:07 am
Here is in the Matter of Cougar Den Inc.: In re Cougar Den 7-24-14 DOL decision We posted on a similar matter here. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:27 pm
Announcing OregonAdminRules.orga free public service to Oregon attorneys and the public provided by a partnership of * John Gear Law Office LLC * Hanson & Walgenkim, LLC* 855ZipDebt.com, Consumer Bankruptcy law* Lawptimize, a legal productivity apps foundryCreation of OregonAdminRules.org was inspired by the refreshing ease and error-reducing readability of OregonLaws.org (the best place to find readable versionsthe Oregon Revised Statutes). [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:32 am
Pediatricians and other health care workers are suing the Biden administration over a mandate tied to health care which would, according to the suit, require medical professionals to provide gender-related services and surgeries despite objections, medical or otherwise.Objections, even to treating children, would be considered “discrimination,” pursuant to Biden’s reinterpretation of sex to include sexual orientation and “gender identity. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 6:47 am
Here are the materials in Narragansett Indian Tribe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:54 am
The until now secretive group is led by a 33-year-old physician-turned-venture capitalist, Tom Cahill, and is described as an elite go-between the pharmaceutical industry and Trump administration decision-makers, or an "ad hoc review board" of sorts pursuing cutting edge outside the box ideas. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:35 am
About a month ago, Ars published actual “six strikes” alerts that Comcast has been sending to its customers believed to be violating copyright over its network. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:30 am
via www.youtube.com [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:30 am
(credit: Judit Klein) Last week, a federal judge in Washington formally accepted the guilty plea of Brian Farrell, the 28-year-old who had been accused in 2015 of being the right-hand man to the head of Silk Road 2.0, the copycat website inspired by the infamous Tor-enabled drug website. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v Attwood & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 998 (19 July… [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:46 am
Parker, R (On the Application Of) v Bashir & Anor (2022) EWHC 358 (Admin) A judicial review of a Magistrates Court decision on costs in a section 82 Environmental Protection Act 1990 prosecution. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:19 am
I was excited to see R(Z) v Hackney LBC & Agudas Israel HA (2019) EWHC 139 (Admin), because it is the first case in which the thorny issue of “nomination” rights and, potentially, the concept of a “true void” have arisen for full decision by a court of record (of which I know anyway), and before the Divisional court (Lindblom LJ & Sir Kenneth Parker) too. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:48 am
In Babakandi v Westminster CC [2011] EWHC 1756 (Admin), Mr Babakandi made a bold challenge to Westminster's allocation scheme (bold, as in post-Ahmad v Newham LBC) together with other grounds. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
The Admin’s Court’s decision upheld. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
The Admin Court held: The judicial review claim was not out of time. [read post]
