Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Superior Court of California tests the scope of the right to sue under state law for failure to disseminate changes in labeling for generic drugs that are substitutes for brand-name drugs. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 10:34 am by Evan M. Levow
The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division recently considered what prior convictions are necessary for the criminal DWLS statute to apply in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am by Russell Jackson
  The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition.  [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  WRAL reports that former superior court judge Arnold O. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  WRAL reports that former superior court judge Arnold O. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:10 am
One Fund administrators alerted the Attorney General's office of the false claim.As part of the Attorney General's investigation into the matter, the police created a `sting’ operation using an overnight courier to deliver a letter to Mattier's residence on July 1, 2013, which stated that the claim had been approved and a check would be arriving July 2, 2013. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
A similar pattern nearly played out in Franklin County, where former clerk of court Patricia Chastain, who had been removed from office by a superior court judge, narrowly lost her bid to be elected back to the same position. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
As a result, the retroactivity provision did not become effective until August 1, 2008 —30 days after its publication in the final SMART guidelines along with the Attorney General’s response to related public comments. [read post]