Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 11:59 am by Brad Pauley
” Justice Sandy Kriegler concurred in the majority’s rejection of the plaintiff’s argument that the class action waiver in her employment contract was unconscionable, noting that Gentry’s “continuing vitality is in doubt after the decision in AT & T, which disapproved the holding in Discover Bank v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am by Robert Chesney
  According to the complaint, she discovered in 2005 while attempting to fly from California to Malaysia that she was on a no-fly list. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
A federal judge in California has found a privacy settlement between a class of email users and Google inadequate, asking the parties to come up with a more detailed disclosure of how Google intercepts and uses emails for targeted advertising. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Cruz-Diaz, No. 07-1534, 07-1535 Armed bank-robbery convictions are affirmed, despite one bank teller's doubt as to whether the gun was real, where eyewitness testimony, the bank's surveillance video, and the discovery of a bullet casing in the getaway car were all consistent with the finding that the gun was real. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Tatum, No. 07-5733 A sentence for bank fraud is vacated where a sentencing enhancement for abusing a position of private trust under U.S.S.G. section 3B1.3 was erroneously applied as defendant did not occupy a position of trust nor possess "special skills". [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am by Bill Ward
See Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am by Jay Willis
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy discusses Thaler v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:13 am by Broc Romanek
In California: Fiduciary Duty of Shareholders under Bylaws Keith Bishop of Allen Matkins notes: Last week, a California court of appeal held - in Tien Le v. [read post]
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
v=4OXIu_mGgK8. [3] Id. [4] Robin Blumenthal, Inside the love-hate relationship between banks and private credit, Private Debt Investor ( [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:25 pm
The question is whether a 1994 ruling by the Court (Central Bank v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Securities Litigation, 60 F.3d 591, 592 (9th Cir. 1995) (applying California law); In re Actimmune Marketing Litigation, 614 F. [read post]