Search for: "Battle v. Battle" Results 1721 - 1740 of 12,442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2021, 8:21 am by Rakim Brooks
However, not all students benefited equally: Black students had little access to GI Bill benefits and, even a decade after Brown v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals revives her case because the trial court did not properly instruct the jury on the elements of her claim.The case is Tardif v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:56 pm by Florian Mueller
In that case, the term "headwinds" might have been limited to the fact that the outcome before the Ninth Circuit was obviously disappointing for the FTC and Qualcomm (through its allies) had succeeded in portraying FTC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:04 am by Marcia Coyle
The justices on April 16, 2021 will take their first look at Jane Doe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
It is reported that the US paparazzi agency, Splash News and Picture Agency, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, saying that its continuing legal battle with the Duchess of Sussex placed “an unacceptable risk to the survival of the business. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
This post provides background on Section 1237, examines the current state of play, and assesses the ongoing legal battle between the U.S. government and the companies over the CCMC label and its accompanying consequences. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a piece in the Sydney Morning Herald which reports that the newspaper argued that it did not defame high-profile criminal defence lawyer Chris Murphy in a column claiming he was battling the “ravages of age” and deafness, and it was merely suggesting he could not attend court during the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]