Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 7,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1),  and then with United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:39 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
On Climate Change Policy Objectives and Compliance with Investment Agreements Laura Létourneau Tremblay, In Need of a Paradigm Shift: Reimagining Eco Oro v Colombia in Light of New Treaty Language Ji Ma, Moving from the Brown Economy to the Green Economy: The Battle over International Intellectual Property Matteo Fermeglia, Cashing-In on the Energy Transition? [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:19 am by Mary Elizabeth Williams
 After failed negotiations, the Foundation filed a complaint in New York against the PIIC in 2012.In The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The National Historical Publications and Records Commission awarded the University of Cincinnati's Archives and Rare Books Library a grant to complete the processing of the records of the Cincinnati Branch of the NAACP related to the Bronson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The Times of Israel and Jerusalem Post report on yesterday's decision by Israel's Supreme Court in    Ministry of the Interior v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
This claim failed in court — most famously in Flood v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
On Friday, the federal government filed a petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 2:51 pm
In May, I commented upon the oral arguments presented to the Michigan Supreme Court in the appeal from the Michigan Court of Appeals decision in the case of Miller v Allstate. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
The United States now remains the only place where the patent is still valid. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm by Randall Reese
Club Forest also points to, among other cases, an earlier decision of the South Carolina Court of Appeals regarding a lease of another Bi-Lo store in which it asserts that the court determined that Bi-Lo had a good faith obligation to find a subtenant rather than leave a store vacant and violated that good faith obligation by refusing to sublet the store to a competing supermarket chain (Columbia East Associates v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]