Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 1721 - 1740 of 21,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 9:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Jessie Hill (Case Western Reserve University - School of Law) has posted Whose Body? [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Employment Opinions;Contract Law Opinions Body: SC18751 - Murtha v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:42 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: SC18481 - State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:22 pm
The boat turned around when O’Callahan’s body was found, and Alaska State Troopers were notified of his death. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:43 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: Below are today's habeas Appellate Court opinions: AC30786 - Crocker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:11 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Below are today's Criminal Law Appellate Court opinions:   AC32057 - State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The signing bonus for pilots of narrow-body aircraft was $7,400, while that for a wide-body pilot was $17,700. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:21 am by sally
Econord SpA v Comune di Cagno and others (Joined Cases C-182/11 and C-183/11); [2012] WLR (D) 356 “The condition established by the case law of the Court of Justice European Union (Teckal Srl v Comune di Viano (Case C-107/98) [1999] ECR I-8121 and Parking Brixen GmbH v Gemeinde Brixen (Case C-485/03) [2005] ECR I-8585) to the effect that, in order to be exempted from their obligation to initiate a public tendering procedure and instead to make an in-house award of a… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:26 am by sally
Regina v Webster [2010] EWCA Crim 2819; [2010] WLR (D) 216 “The reverse onus of proof which s 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916 effected on a prosecution for an offence contrary to s 1(2) of the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, placing on the defendant the legal burden of disproving guilt was no longer necessary and the means of imposition were unreasonable and disproportionate, and so it unjustifiably interfered with the presumption of innocence provided by… [read post]