Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 10,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Patten LJ (who gave the lead judgment) stated that where a company makes a claim for losses suffered by it as a result of the conduct of a fraudulent director, it does not matter if the company was the intended primary or secondary victim of the fraud. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The panel concluded that it was bound by prior decisions from the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
The majority stated that it would have been quite willing to be bound by the International Court of Justice’s determination of U.S. obligations under the Vienna Convention, if Congress had decreed that U.S. courts should be so bound. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am by Binaifer Nowrojee
This is not a contentious case where parties are bound to comply with the judges’ ruling. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
State,849 N.E.2d 556, 562 (Ind. 2006); Williams v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 1:03 am
All those things belong to the State (i.e. [read post]