Search for: "Cable v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 1,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1224, 1239-1240 [60 Cal.Rptr.3d 631], citing to Gregory v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
A previous post captioned “Texas Sales & Use Tax: no sales tax exemption allowed for purchases of reels on which a supplier delivered wire and cable to its customers” described the Texas Third Court of Appeals’ December 12th decision in Houston Wire & Cable Company v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
On Tuesday the First Department was confronted by these issues in People v Corliss, 2008 NY Slip Op 01869, which involved a prosecution for an attempted parachute jump off the Empire State Building. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Fearns (t/a Autopaint International) v Anglo-Dutch Paint & Chemical Company Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 99 (19 February 2008) Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust & Anor v Williams [2008] EWCA Civ 71 (15 February 2008) Raissi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 72 (14 February 2008) Coleman & Anor v Ibstock Brick Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 73 (14… [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
Second, the EIA standard states the appropriate spacing used between open-top cable supports. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:14 pm
Multivision Cable T.V. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:31 am
See Turner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
In Sitrick v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
It called the move by the Denver-based cable provider "preposterous. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:38 am
In Arista v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:46 pm
In Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:04 am
In Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
The vote was 324-321, but the loser got a court order preventing the winner from taking office while the outcome is still in dispute.From the Fourth Circuit, in DirecTV, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:18 am
See Venegas-Hernandez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
Constitution for the first time since the 18 paragraph decision in United States v. [read post]
