Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 1721 - 1740 of 9,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am by Adam Wagner
They argued that, following the Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) judgment (among other things), the ERO was obliged to add their names to the electoral register. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm by Carla Laroche
United States, the Supreme Court analyzed the Armed Career Criminal Act’s force clause or elements clause. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm by Peter Mahler
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am by Florian Mueller
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
  His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:57 am by Julie McGrain
In a rare reversal of a district court's speedy trial decision, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:56 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Wednesday morning agreed to review a ruling by a federal appeals court that would significantly restrict (but not eliminate altogether) access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Specifically: In circumstances where (i) a non -EU national spouse and her EU national children accompanied an EU national who came to the United Kingdom (ii) the EU national was in the United Kingdom as a worker (iii) the EU national then ceased to be a worker and subsequently left the United Kingdom (iv) the EU national, the non-EU national spouse and children are not self-sufficient and are dependent upon social assistance in the United Kingdom… [read post]