Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2021, 2:21 pm
Michael Flynn's Brother v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:23 pm
State, No. 43Co1-0705-FA-127 (Ind. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
Brief of Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm
Salamea v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:16 am
Patchak, consolidated with Salazar v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 8:41 am
Although Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 8:19 pm
For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:52 am
Yasin v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:17 am
In the 15 Member States where the mark in question has inherent distinctive character, there is no need to require the acquisition of distinctive character through use. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
It was only the second case in history, after United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
See Figueiredo-Torres v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:51 am
State Tax Comm’n, 28 N.W. 2d 799 (Iowa 1947), and Utilcorp United Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:51 am
State Tax Comm’n, 28 N.W. 2d 799 (Iowa 1947), and Utilcorp United Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:18 am
He likens this notion to Bluman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 6:57 pm
See Gordon v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
” The court, however, rapidly rejected this argument, noting that the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
” Some of the advocacy groups involved in the present case are reoccurring characters in ongoing affirmative action saga. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:52 am
Kobman v. [read post]