Search for: "Character v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
  Brief of Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 8:19 pm
For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:17 am
In the 15 Member States where the mark in question has inherent distinctive character, there is no need to require the acquisition of distinctive character through use. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
It was only the second case in history, after United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Farah Mukaddam (UK)
In response, Specsavers relied not on the use of the wordless mark itself, but on the use of the following logo (which became known as the ‘shaded logo’): Article 15 of the CTM Regulation states that the use of a registered trade mark may be made “in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered”. [read post]