Search for: "Does 1 to 50" Results 1721 - 1740 of 16,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 6:29 am by admin
  The difference between 1.56 and 2.08 does not sound large. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:08 pm by David Frakt
USD’s entering class of 2014 was very strong with LSAT 75/50/25 of 161/159/155  and UGPA of 3.66/3.50/3.23. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 1:23 pm
 Even in a worst-case analysis, where the foxy federal agency project really does eat the poor endangered hen, without having undertaken the formal consultation process, there will be consequences. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 11:53 am by Randye Snyder and Regan Canfill
Expanded Definition of Qualified Individual IRS Notice 2020-50 expands the CARES Act definition of a qualified individual who is eligible for CRDs, loans, and loan payment suspension. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 11:53 am by Liskow & Lewis and Randye Snyder
Expanded Definition of Qualified Individual IRS Notice 2020-50 expands the CARES Act definition of a qualified individual who is eligible for CRDs, loans, and loan payment suspension. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:29 pm by Anthony Zaller
SB 778 does not change the timing requirements for sexual harassment training for supervisors for employers with 50 or more employees. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:24 am
  Currently, in order to serve on the Federal Circuit, one must live within 50 miles of Washington, DC, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
In its reasoning, the Court inter alia stated that the concept of “provision of services” cannot be interpreted in the light of the Court’s approach with regard to the freedom to provide services within the meaning of Art. 50 EC since Art. 50 EC requires a broad interpretation (para. 34 et seq.) while Art. 5 (1) Brussels I has to be interpreted narrowly due to the fact that it derogates - as a special jurisdiction rule - from the general… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
If you have more than $1 billion in assets under management, you need to pay attention to this rule. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:59 am
It DOES NOT mean there is a delay in the compliance rules, it merely delays the requirement that a plan document be signed by January 1. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
If you have more than $1 billion in assets under management, you need to pay attention to this rule. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Also the appellants submitted that due to a “release” of the activity of the original substance to the diluent during the multiple dilutions, the diluent of the dilutions referred to in claim 1 has properties which the undiluted diluent does not have. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Or you make the disclaimer clear, but then it does not fit the prior art any more, and the disclaimer will not comply with the requirements of G 1/03. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:02 pm
  [1]  This fact alone may keep buyers away more than any of its physical characteristics. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:51 pm
Keep in mind that equitable does not necessarily mean equal or 50/50 like in community property states. [read post]