Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Think about that - the work of 200 dedicated people affected the lives of 1 million. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am by Law is Cool
[emphasis added] The Plaintiffs have based their opposition to the motion largely on the basis of R. 21.01(1)(b), that there is no reasonable cause of action. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
(Notice how this ties in to the normative/empirical question I raised above: what does it mean to provide “steam”?) [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm by David Skover
  Not only does the president enjoy unequaled access to the mass media, but his symbolic position as our national leader lends greater authority to information on national security that his administration largely controls. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:48 am by Carl Shusterman
  Well, guess what, the regulation does not make beneficiaries go to the end of the line. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the present case, however, the claimed amounts represent a continuum of a numerical range of values which does not correspond to distinctive alternative embodiments. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It follows that features (d), (f), (g) and (h) are not technical features of the claimed liquid formulation in the sense of R 29(1) and decision G 2/88. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
  The Big 4 meat slaughter companies kill 88 percent of our feedlot cattle, constituting a substantial adversary to an agency--which is paralyzed by the fear of litigation from the Big 4. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The same applies to auxiliary requests 1 to 10. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Negligence in use or operation of vehicle attributable to owner. 1. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  These ATTM allies argue that it does not matter what the evidence in a case would show, that it does not matter what the state law at issue says, and that there is simply a federal right for any corporation to put in any contract a term that bans class actions (so long as the contract includes an arbitration clause). [read post]