Search for: "E Holder"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 7:21 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 6:52 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 3:48 am
Munro also offered us a pointer for that task — a citation to a doctoral dissertation, now freely available an e-book: Eric Anderson. (2010). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 2:52 am
Whether or not the safe harbor provision of art. 10 Telemediengesetz (which implements art. 14 (1) E-Commerce Directive) applied was irrelevant.The fact that without YouTube's contribution, the infringement could not have occurred was insufficient to create civil liability. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:37 am
I am guessing, however, that this (and Google) is the reason for the sudden blip of renewed interest in an article Matt and I published inMealey’s Litigation Report — Cyber Tech & E-Commerce, back when publishing your ideas on paper made some sense, in May of 2001. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:56 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:20 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:48 am
Apple flap exploded on the public scene just as I was learning my way around my new Estonian e-Residency card, which promises—among other things—secure communications between card holders. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
These include weak privacy protections, anti-spam standards, and e-commerce rules. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:37 am
It is collected on behalf of the individual copyright holders by a copyright-collecting society called Austro-Mechana. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:22 am
The definition of "certificate holder" was changed for clarification. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 2:31 pm
Cohen Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am
Assurances for Canada on Privacy, Day 15: Weak Anti-Spam Law Standards, Day 16: Intervening in Internet Governance, Day 17: Weak E-commerce Rules, Day 18: Failure to Protect Canadian Cultural Policy, Day 19: No Canadian Side Agreement to Advance Tech Sector, Day 20: Unenforceable Net Neutrality Rules, Day 21: U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
Assurances for Canada on Privacy, Day 15: Weak Anti-Spam Law Standards, Day 16: Intervening in Internet Governance, Day 17: Weak E-commerce Rules, Day 18: Failure to Protect Canadian Cultural Policy, Day 19: No Canadian Side Agreement to Advance Tech Sector, Day 20: Unenforceable Net Neutrality Rules, Day 21: U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:25 am
The removal of search results is clearly a big point of contention, and should the Supreme Court follow the decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada could become the next destination for intellectual property rights holders to better enforce their rights on the Internet. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
After attending the PLUS D&O Symposium some years ago, several colleagues at Partner Re thought it might be worthwhile to provide D&O insurance professionals with historical overview of the evolution of Directors and Officers insurance (D&O) in the US marketplace. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
(prior posts in the series include Day 1: US Blocks Balancing Provisions, Day 2: Locking in Digital Locks, Day 3: Copyright Term Extension, Day 4: Copyright Notice and Takedown Rules, Day 5: Rights Holders “Shall” vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:34 am
“[W]e are aware of no authority suggesting that the First Amendment prevents states from protecting consumers against irrational psychological annoyances. [read post]
