Search for: "EVANS v. STATE" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by David Ettinger
On April 4 and 5, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): State Building & Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
Evans, barring states from singling out homosexuals for discriminatory treatment in state laws. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources The Justice Gap website is also supporting the ‘Open Justice Week’ initiative (see events, below) and has published a guide to reporting the English courts by Kim Evans, with input from David Banks, Philippa Thomas and Rupert Evelyn. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:29 pm by Jason Mazzone
Evans, Vik returns us to the question of standing. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm by GuestPost
The Court thus equated Proposition 8 to the Colorado laws struck down inRomer v Evans, and structured its decision around the fact that Proposition 8 singled out homosexual couples for differential treatment by removing a right which they had previously enjoyed on an equal basis to everyone else. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm by Eoin Daly
The Court thus equated Proposition 8 to the Colorado laws struck down in Romer v Evans, and structured its decision around the fact that Proposition 8 singled out homosexual couples for differential treatment by removing a right which they had previously enjoyed on an equal basis to everyone else. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am by Rob Robinson
Rabiej Leaves The Sedona Conference for Duke Law Center - bit.ly/xOirdg (Brendan McKenna) Keeping Your Outsourced Solution From Becoming A Problem - bit.ly/A61j6J (Joey Seeber, Shaun Yeh) Making The Most Of Delaware’s New eDiscovery Rules: Tips 1-5 - bit.ly/zQXx9T (Daniel Garrie) More Legal Issues about Privacy (and GPS) - bit.ly/xb9Apl (Peter Vogel) NY State Court adopts Zubulake Standard: Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation Triggers… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]