Search for: "Ex Parte March" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm by The White Law Group
  Ex- Morgan Stanley Broker Charged with Fraud  January 24, 2024 – Jesus Rodriguez Charged with Defrauding Advisory Clients   The SEC has charged former financial advisor Jesus Rodriguez, previously employed at Morgan Stanley, with defrauding ten clients by orchestrating over 250 unauthorized disbursements totaling more than $3.475 million. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
On March 10, 1983, Lisker went to his parents’ house—to, he said, borrow a car jack. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
  In two recent decisions announced after the oral arguments in the Bilski case, Ex parte Langemyr (May 28, 2008) and Ex parte Wasynczuk (June 2, 2008),[3] the PTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences has now supplied an answer to that question: A general purpose computer is not a particular machine, and thus innovative software processes are unpatentable if they are tied only to a general purpose computer. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as applicant of the refused application in suit and proprietor of the revoked patent in suit, filed appeals (ex-parte appeal T 2719/19 and inter partes appeal T 1513/17) allocated to the same board of appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
In a letter dated 15 March 2013, the respondent (patentee) requested that the decision of the opposition division be upheld, i.e. that the patent be maintained in amended form. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Under the proposed guidance, `orders, modifications, or cancellations’ would not be considered spoofing if `submitted as part of a legitimate, good-faith attempt to consummate a trade. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 9:03 pm
"The dialogue is advancing ... and by January, February or March, it will be strengthened," he said. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
I also benefit from working with a number of Yale law students as part of my office’s internship and externship programs. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:58 am
Ex-Congressman Khaliquzzaman and Nawab Ismail Khan conducted parleys and Congress was in no mood to oblige. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Singer Ciara has dropped her $15 million defamation suit against her ex-fiancé Future Friday, a year after she first accused the rapper of slander. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:59 am by Legal Beagle
This appointment will run for five years from a date which has still to be confirmed but likely to be sometime around March. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:32 am
He also stated: I'm not going to continue to tolerate indefinite delay on the part of the United States government. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cette demande relève du Comité exécutif du Barreau, mais les critères d’évaluation sont les mêmes que ceux se trouvant à l’article 45. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm by admin
”[9] Although the piece was labeled “editorial,” the journal provided no disclaimer that Wasserstein was not speaking ex cathedra. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:49 pm by Wiggam Law
If the arrangement is for taxes due after March 31st, it may take more than a month to receive a reply. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
The third part addresses the changes in methodology adopted and some of the rules so far proposed by the drafters of the future new Restatement. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am by Alan Rozenshtein
However, because only a plurality of the Justices signed on to this part of the opinion, it was not part of the Supreme Court’s holding and thus not binding on the D.C. [read post]