Search for: "Ford Motor Company "
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Remember, this is pediatric surgery, and very few companies sell either drugs or devices specifically intended and approved for use in children. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
Ford Motor Company, No. 1-04-3800, (1-15-09) found that the plaintiff who filed complaint alleging negligent design and strict product liability against vehicle manufacturer, who took voluntary dismissal of her complaint after trial court granted partial summary judgment striking allegations of each count alleging vehicle was subject to rollover; but preserving defective seatbelt allegations of each count, dismissed complaint and allowed plaintiff to file new count with… [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:30 am
" At the time of the accident, Crystal owned a 1994 Ford Escort at the time of the accident. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:08 am
News of the assistance comes as Britain's car industry, which is mostly owned by overseas giants like Ford, Nissan, Honda and Tata Motors, is pleading for yet more taxpayer assistance to help it through the current economic meltdown. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:19 pm
Click "Continue Reading" to view a chart that provides a side-by-side comparison of the tax provisions in the House and Senate versions of “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 10:24 pm
General Motors Corporation and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:33 am
Jan. 29: Ford Motor's (nyse: F - news - people ) credit subsidiary cuts 1,200 jobs, about 20% of its workforce. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:19 am
Mariano's 2005 Ford Escape was $1,712.96. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 6:49 am
Last month, the family of TV anchorwoman Polly Gonzalez filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Ford Motor Co. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 6:16 am
The jury found Ford Motor Company at no fault in a pickup truck rollover accident that resulted in personal injuries and a wrongful death. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 7:32 am
In 1971, when Lee Iacocca was President of Ford Motor Company, he so strongly opposed automobile airbags that he personally appealed to then President Richard Nixon and persuaded the President to kill a pending federal regulation mandating airbags for U.S. cars. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:10 pm
The company pays a fine. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 739 (1978). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Ford Motor Company, 435 F.3d 785 (7th Cir. 2006), the 7th Circuit held that the substitution or addition of class representatives in a class action following the enactment of CAFA does not recommence an action for removal purposes so long as the amendment relates back to the original complaint. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Ford Motor Company, 435 F.3d 785 (7th Cir. 2006), the 7th Circuit held that the substitution or addition of class representatives in a class action following the enactment of CAFA does not recommence an action for removal purposes so long as the amendment relates back to the original complaint. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:11 am
" In case you missed the point, "Any other approach only invites and encourages overwhelming, vexatious, baseless, exorbitant, and destructive litigation" (See my post of Oct. 22, 2005: little frivolous litigation occurs; June 6, 2006: judges find small numbers of cases frivolous; May 8, 2007: Ford Motor won't settle.). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Ford Motor Company (1982) 32 Cal.3d 388); When the plaintiff seeks to introduce such evidence to prove notice - as when seeking punitive damages - the standard is more relaxed: "all that is required ... is that the previous injury should be such as to attract the defendant's attention to the dangerous situation ... [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:34 am
I was under the impression that part of the reason for bailing out the Big Three (although Ford didn't take the money, to its credit), was that the impact of Chrysler or GM going out of business was that it impacted to great a segment of the economy, so better to keep them in business in order to keep these up and down stream companies in business. [read post]
