Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2010, 1:51 am by war
Jack Brabham Engines Limited v Beare [2010] FCA 872 [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm by Morris Turek
  It is impossible for me to believe that Yogubliz wasn’t attempting to capitalize on the goodwill associated with DQ’s BLIZZARD trademark because there is simply no competitive need or reason for Yogubliz to have adopted BLIZZ or BLIZZBERRY for frozen yogurt other than to unfairly hitch a ride on Dairy Queen’s immense success. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:00 am by Glenn Cohen
While Perry and the Prop 8 litigation has been getting most of the attention in the media and blogosphere, the Massachusetts District court decisions in Gill v OPM and Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:40 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
An imputation will be considered defamatory if it exposed the plaintiff to hate, contempt or ridicule (see Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press (1991) 23 NSW LR 443); tended to make the plaintiff shunned or avoided (Morgan v Lingen (1863) 8 LT 800); tended to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of others (Sim v Stretch (1936) 52 TLR 669). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Hot off the presses and straight from the source, I have an advanced copy of the International Court of Justice preliminary ruling concerning Italy’s counterclaims in the Jurisdiction Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm
In Visa International Service Association v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:49 am by smlangston
Yang Liwei, the first astronaut China sent to the aerospace by Shenzhou V Manned Spacecraft, who is therefore entitled the “National Hero” by the Chinese people. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hard to explain how the loss of goodwill will hurt the brand over time. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Kelly
– Now on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/taxgirl Technorati Tags: charitable gifts, Roberts v. [read post]