Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 1721 - 1740 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Stephen Page
This is because the trial judge found that the wifes contributions were not made more arduous by reason of the husbands violence. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:42 pm
These rulings are affirmed because the wife's inheritance was substantial, the parties' living circumstances were extremely modest during the marriage, and the husband can earn enough to meet his needs in a style characteristic of the marital standard of living. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In that case, the plaintiff's wife sued the State of New York, causing the state to retaliate against Adler, the husband. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 1:37 pm by admin
In Hardy, the Circuit Court examined the decreased income of the husband as well as noting the decreased financial needs of the wife. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court also declined to award the wife additional counsel fees and determined that the sum remaining in the husbands Wells Fargo brokerage account was separate property not subject to equitable distribution. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:06 pm by Stephen Page
His Honour responded that it was the husbands “personal tax”, and he can be read as enquiring as to why the wife should be responsible for the interest and penalties which arose because the tax was not paid. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Megen Miller
In Richards, the trial court specifically found that the husband did not comply with the court's orders and that the violations “certainly caused confusion and extra time by all parties involved,” but because of the spousal support and property award denied attorney's fees to the wife. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:01 am
The unemployment in question was temporary and the ex-wife's mere attainment of a master's degree did not justify the imputation of income to her. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff’s wife was finishing checking out in a retail store while the Plaintiff-husband went out to get the couple’s vehicle. [read post]