Search for: "I v. B" Results 1721 - 1740 of 24,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
His reason being, if one says, “I like cats and dogs which are black and fluffy“, it is quite unlikely that what one means is “I like cats which are fluffy and dogs which are black and fluffy”. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat) at [134]… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
 Judge Murguia then says that this phrase unambiguously applies to the judge here since Rule 1(b)(2) defines "court" as including a federal judge performing any judicial function and Rule 1(b)(3) says that includes magistrate judges.Fair enough. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm by Deborah Wald
The most notorious of these cases was Nancy S. v. [read post]