Search for: "IN RE A W-M"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Odd if we’re trying to provide a reward for inventors. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
Webb asked opposing counsel's husband, then state representative Edward Lindsey, for a letter of recommendation for re-appointment by the governor of Georgia to a professional board. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:56 am
They followed former President George W. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Queens University (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:47 am
(Or at least, you need to subcontract the thuggery, a la the George W. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
,” 31 W. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 10:36 am
I'm not -- I'm not going to sit here and say, "Oh, I'm not on either side. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 3:54 pm
They’re too normal. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
But also industry guides, consumer guides—w/o the traditional protections for rulemaking—notice and comment, openness. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am
Ard: you’re concerned with the economic consequences of interference w/Ray Charles’ intent. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
If the argument is design patent needs more than what it has, I’m with you there, but it’s surprising to think that copyright might be a good model. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Began w/Ken Port’s Mitchell Study on TM Litigation—2972 cases; adding stock prices to it; pulling out cases w/o a publicly traded party. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:45 am
But we have to -- I'm the only one on this stage that said, "Do not go into Iraq. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RANDALL W. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
Brian Farrell: Effective immediately, shareholders at the Ringler Associates Annual Meeting on January 29, 2016 re-elected Brian M. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
As the California Supreme Court has explained, “A statute that merely clarifies, rather than changes, existing law” may be “applied to transactions predating its enactment” See W. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:10 am
” He reiterated: [W]e’re also a nation of laws. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:16 am
W. [read post]
