Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Nor can she “assist or permit” the client to do something “dishonourable” (Rule 5.1-2(b)). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am by Amy Howe
The lower courts ruled for the state, but in 2016 the Supreme Court threw out those rulings, holding that the lower courts had misconstrued the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, a federal law governing the National Park Service’s authority over lands in Alaska. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am by Ron Coleman
Yes, child porn was there even back then. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm by Paul Premack
Prop 4: the amendment to a) allow the legislature to set a temporary limit on the maximum appraised value of non-homestead real property for property tax purposes, b) increase the homestead exemption from school taxes from $40,000 to $100,000, c) give those 65+ or disabled additional relief on school taxes, d) allow the legislature more flexibility to appropriate funds to pay for property tax relief, and e) allow the legislature to impose a four-year term of office for appraisal… [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Thus, the act allowed the justices to reject most appeals and to carefully select cases that involved particularly pressing national issues or that exerted a special temptation in terms of their own varied interests and values. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
Abbott (08-645) Argued: Jan. 12, 2010 Issue: Whether a ne exeat clause confers a “right of custody” within the meaning of the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Kashmir Hill
If not lawyers, he’d be a writer and she’d be an interior designer. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:18 am by William Ford
Demonstrated interest in the law desired. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Following the Ban, defendants [Schwanz, Tofte, and Brookfield]—each of whom has a child or children attending Newberg public schools, and each of whom disagreed with the Ban—posted information about plaintiffs' employers in a private Facebook group called "Newberg Equity in Education" (NEEd). [read post]
At a minimum, businesses should provide information on how a consumer with a disability may access the notice in an alternative format. (999.305(a)(2)(d); 999.306(a)(2)(d); 999.307(a)(2)(d); and 999.308(a)(2)(d))The draft regulations make it clear that the notice requirement covers not only online but also offline collection of personal information. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
EIR 2004, reg 12(4)(b) – whether request is manifestly unreasonable: Robert Brown v IC EA/2010/0119. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 7:58 am by Richard West
Schedule E focuses on priority claims, which are debts entitled to priority repayment such as tax debts or child support. [read post]