Search for: "Idaho Supreme Court" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Susan Herman, President, ACLU
That story received coverage in the news when the Supreme Court heard al-Kidd's case — and decided that the Attorney General should be immune from the lawsuit al-Kidd brought in the hope that no one else would have to suffer what he suffered. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has so held as to obscenity and as to unprotected commercial speech. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:02 pm by cdw
LEXIS 9910, 2010 FED App. 0138P (6th Cir. 5/14/2010) “Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a defendant convicted of aggravated murder and aggravated robbery and sentenced to death is affirmed and the petition dismissed where: 1) the Ohio Supreme Court’s finding that “the record fails to reveal sufficient indicia of incompetency” did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent;… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:18 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Supreme Court, major broadcasters have challenged the continued application of “intermediate scrutiny” analysis to broadcast speech. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Stripped to its essentials, any federal preemption argument amounts to the proposition that "supreme" federal power requires/encourages me/my client to do what we're doing. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
There's no medical monitoring precedent either way in Idaho either.IllinoisCourts in Illinois are all over the lot, and the state's supreme court ha [read post]
Finally, 13 states (Delaware, Idaho, Hawaii, Kentucky, Mississippi, New York, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming and West Virginia) do not explicitly specify who can collect and return ballots on the voter’s behalf. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court held in Merck that the statute of limitations is not triggered until the claimant has knowledge of the facts constituting the violation, including the facts constituting scienter. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Wallis, MD Florida 2013http://t.co/7psHtlPOaz -> TRO granted to prevent open sourcing of infringing software BATTELLE ENERGY v SOUTHFORK SECURITY Idaho 2013http://t.co/b68D3Uw6mY -> Hosting agreement terminated for customer spamming AHOSTING, INC. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court in a politically charged election-law case. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision that will make it more difficult to challenge a spate of new state-level voting restrictions. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court justices invoked fears of bribery and chaos to suggest they think states can require presidential electors to back their states’ popular vote winner in the Electoral College. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:58 am
Saucier Than Usual, the Supreme Court Tackles a Precedent Legal Times In granting review in a new case on police immunity Monday, the Supreme Court took the rare step of announcing its intention to examine whether one of its relatively recent precedents, Saucier v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm by Jason Rantanen
  And for good reason: this conclusion runs counter to unambiguous Supreme Court prec [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by SHG
  What about the requirement that criminal laws provide fair notice of what they prescribe, when Supreme Court justices can't agree whether certain conduct is criminal, yet its sufficient to put you or I in prison? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm by Guest Blogger
  Even if the plaintiffs manage to draw a sympathetic panel in the Ninth Circuit, a decision invalidating Congress’s decision that gray wolves should be delisted without the possibility of judicial review would be too tempting a target for the current Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am by Brett Holubeck
  Arizona (Arizona Hospital Worker Minimum Wage and Insurance Regulations Initiative), Idaho (Idaho Minimum Wage Increase Initiative), and Missouri (Missouri Prohibit State Preemption of Local Minimum Wage and Benefits Laws Initiative) also have potential ballot measures related to the minimum wage next year. [read post]