Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 1721 - 1740 of 1,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
But, after initially examining the case, the Court asked the objectors for their views. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
In re Chambers, cause number 14-02-00020-CV in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.The Fourteenth Court of Appeals issued an opinion on February 7, 2002, denying appellants’ petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Our initial thought, since our post was six months after Thompson was decided, was "how could the world miss this? [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
On April 2, 2003, Lynn filed a Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship and Request for Temporary Orders. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Re-clarifying the aims and conclusions of the Mashelkar Committee Report (Spicy IP) India: will IP litigation be both 'punctual' and 'faithful'? [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
The convent had no time-temperature gauge to record and monitor the process. 2. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(ISinIP) CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) All you need to know about Bilski in a 30 min podcast - debate between Prof M Risch and Prof J Sarnoff (IP Think Tank) (Patent Baristas)… [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:09 pm by Guru Immigration
For example, many B-1/B-2 tourist visas have a 10-year expiration printed on them. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:09 pm by Guru Immigration
For example, many B-1/B-2 tourist visas have a 10-year expiration printed on them. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Back in January, we put up a short post noting the filing of a petition for extraordinary ("King's Bench") review in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:08 pm
There, had the petition been thrown out for improper service, the petitioner still had time to file a new petition for cancellation.Here, the opposition period had expired by the time Lindt made proper service, so Lindt could not have timely re-filed the opposition. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 11:32 pm
A separate $80 biometric fee is required if an applicant is 14 years of age or older (see Table 2 in the Federal Register notice if you are required to pay the biometrics fee). [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:27 am
We are urging everyone to help support the campaign of No Cuts @ King's and sign the online petition at [www.petitiononline.com]We will keep you informed of developments. [read post]