Search for: "In re PHILLIPS"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “the majority’s condemnation of what it saw as the commission’s lack of respect for Phillips’ Christian beliefs raises questions about another big pending case: Is President Trump’s travel ban based largely on hostility toward Muslims? [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
The Never-Ending Quest for Shareholder Rights: Special Meetings and Written Consent Posted by Emiliano Catan and Marcel Kahan (New York University), on Friday, May 31, 2019 Tags: Agency costs, Boards of Directors, Classified boards, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Staggered boards, Written consent Rulemaking Petition on Non-GAAP Financials in Proxy Statements Posted by Ken Bertsch & Jeffrey Mahoney, Council of Institutional Investors,… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
Edgewood Properties Inc., (D.N.J. 2009) and Phillip M. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:28 am
My colleague Ian Adams captured the essential challenge in memetic form: We’re a week into September, about 60 days from the midterms and three weeks from the end of the fiscal year. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:48 am
Phillips, 126 So. 3d 186, 190 (Fla. 2013). [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 11:08 am
The last time I blogged about this subject was in March, just after the attorneys representing plaintiffs in a lawsuit against Starbucks decided that Florida wasn’t the ideal place for their lawsuit and decided to re-file in California. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
MOOPPAN: So we're not denying the significance of that interest in the abstract. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 4:32 pm
Xavier Von Erck wrote:They're Muslims. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
” More recently, in Re British Broadcasting Corporation [2010] 1 AC 145; [2009] UKHL 34 (concerning the proposed identification of an acquitted rapist subject to an anonymity ruling in a television programme about the abolition of the rule against double jeopardy) Lord Brown, with whom Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker and Neuberger all agreed, addressed, at [65]-[66], the same point as follows: “Why [D] asks rhetorically, cannot the BBC broadcast their programme… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media Research Inc (PatLit)… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
If you’re on the train working on my file on your laptop, you’re a criminal and you’re fired. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:33 am
Congress continues to govern by cliff—and now they’re doing so with national security authorizations. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:26 am
They're human. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
"I am still heartbroken…and you're wounded, but you will survive. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Judge Sontchi in in re Premier International Holdings disagreed sharply that Rule 2019 extends to ad hoc committees. [23] He then went on to explain that any amendments to Rule 2019 to increase the required disclosures would have no affect to those not already covered by the rule. [24]Judge Sontchi’s decision was in complete opposition to that of his counterpart, Judge Walwrath’s in in re Washington Mutual Inc. [25] Judge Walwrath used the currently proposed amendments… [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
It was, instead a guy named Kenneth Phillips. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:02 pm
It doesn't tell you what they're doing. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(The Prior Art) Suggestions for fixing the US patent system (IP Watchdog) Obscure patent: Scriptured outdoor furniture (IP Watchdog) Published applications as prior art (Patently-O) Requester success rates in inter partes re-examination (Patently-O) Innovation Alliance video (Patently-O) Question on dedication of material (Patently-O) Bilski case: Financial services, patent experts seek more certainty on business-method patents (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents –… [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:23 am
Overkill, maybe: but we haven’t seen so much interest in a consistory court judgment since Re St Giles, Exhall. [read post]
