Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 12:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
  On the other hand, there was his concurring opinion in Graham v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:44 pm by Glenn
In the late 19th century, Western Union settled patent litigation with Alexander Graham Bell by entering into an agreement under which it would confine its business to the then-lucrative telegraph market, believing the telephone to be a luxury fad. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Florida (08-7621) and Graham v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:55 am by Ryan Singel
Swartz maintains he was a co-founder, and Y-Combinator’s Paul Graham has referred to him as a founder. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:40 am by INFORRM
Graham Mather was right this morning: it is not a binary choice. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by David LaBahn
Graham, “[w]hen an individual purchases a cell phone and chooses a service provider, he expects the provider will, at a minimum, route outgoing and incoming calls and text messages. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) reportedly applauded the settlement and said that if the federal government does not meet its commitment by 2037, “I don’t know if I’ll be around. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler
Or to take a less politically loaded claim, what of Pastor Andy Savage’s sexual assault on a high school student 20 years ago or of Anna Graham Hunter’s revelations regarding Dustin Hoffman’s on-set sexual harassment of her over 30 years ago. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:58 pm by Paul Maharg
Bright Air and Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 7:54 am by Monica Williamson
Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP Director of Diversity, Equity, and Client Relations, Portland, OR. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
In place of Rosen-Durling, the court adopted the analytical framework for design patent obviousness already outlined for utility patents by Graham v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Concurrence: We shouldn't defer, but it doesn't matter, because there was no prejudice. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm by Eric
Named plaintiffs include Davis, Thompson, Graham, Singley, Howard, Seamon, Beatty, Parrish, Rutledge, Brkic and Hoffman [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:37 am by Legal Beagle
Yet if their plans and decisions hatched in private are sound and fair then why do they have to be forced to eventually disclose so many matters of public interest? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:21 am by Kevin LaCroix
Hat tip to the Jones, Lemon & Graham’s D&O Digest Blog (here) for the link to the opinion. [read post]