Search for: "John Does, 1-9" Results 1721 - 1740 of 3,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
  John takes the lead in a scene on a train, while a gaggle of schoolgirls paw at the Beatles. [read post]
Despite the seeming centrality of the Take Care Clause to the definition of executive power, the Supreme Court has not said very much about the clause, as Jack Goldsmith and John Manning have noted. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
He does, however, still have very interesting things to say. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm by WIMS
The Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday, February 1, 2012, at 9:30 AM. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:10 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
John McCain (R-AZ) – support the increase but others are balking at significant increases to military spending. 9. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
The Constitution’s Article 1, Section 9, and Article 1, Section 10 only apply to the ability of Congress and the states to grant their own noble titles. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Heartland Industrial Partners, LLC and Steelworkers (34-CE-9; 348 NLRB No. 72) Greenwich, CT Nov. 7, 2006. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Dan Pinnington
Significantly, the schedule does not include limitation periods imposed pursuant to federal statutes and also does not include limitation periods arising from the statutes that are referred to in section 2(1) of the Limitations Act, 2002. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 10:28 am
This analysis does not assess, however, the possibility that the Republican Presidential ticket, headed by John McCain, might win one or more of the 20 states that went Democratic in 2004. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
  Donelan failed to give the number; this blog does. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:23 am by emagraken
, , 2011 SCC 9, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 214, at paras. 63 and 112; Botiuk, at para. 62 [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
  Special Counsel Jack Smith’s massive legal brief detailing former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election does not take elaborate sleuthing to decode. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am by David Kris
  There is a question whether to distinguish in our law between surveillance targeting a specific person and surveillance that does not target any specific person.[17] This was an enormously important distinction when FISA was enacted in 1978, with the statute designed to focus on any targeting of a particular, known U.S. person inside the United States.[18]  Collection targeting a specific person may be more intrusive than generic surveillance that happens to collect… [read post]