Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Ayala, a 5-4 majority (including both Thomas and Kennedy), upheld the defendant’s conviction against a Batson challenge. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
Town of Gilbert (9-0 per Thomas), Walker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 6:23 am
Cain:Justice Sotomayor [joined by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Kennedy] wrote... an opinion that was focused almost exclusively upon the specific evidence about whether the convicted man, Kevan Brumfield, was intellectually disabled....Justice Thomas wrote one dissenting opinion.... [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
Ayala for this blog; other coverage comes from the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), where Marcia Coyle focuses on Justice Justice Anthony Kennedy’s “unusual concurrence” and Justice Clarence Thomas’s “unusually blunt and unsympathetic reply. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:51 pm
Justices Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Kennedy dissented. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm
The majority opinion was supported by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Kennedy. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas (with Kennedy and Thomas filing concurring opinions). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am
Instead, the more interesting takeaway from the case may well be the rather heated exchange between Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas, both of whom joined the majority opinion in full. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion, joined by the other conservatives and by Justice Sotomayor (interestingly, the same lineup as in Sorrell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:40 am
Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
The Court split 5-4; Breyer wrote for Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, while Alito dissented joined by the Chief, Scalia, and Kennedy. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
Justices Kennedy and Thomas filed concurring opinions. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:56 am
Justice Thomas' majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Sotomayor) concluded that the provisions placing greater restrictions on temporary directional signs than on signs conveying other messages (such as ideological and political signs) "are content-based regulations of speech that cannot survive strict scrutiny. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:17 am
The majority in an opinion by Justice Breyer (joined by Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan) held the specialty plates are government speech, and that "when government speaks, it is not barred by the Free Speech Clause from determining the content of what it says. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:07 am
Justice Thomas wrote his own opinion, also concurring in judgment. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Kennedy issued a concurring opinion. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
" Justice Thomas writes the main opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
Justice Kennedy has not been so lucky during OT14. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Justice Kennedy wrote for himself and Justice Alito. [read post]
