Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 157,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Rodeheaver acquiesced in the court's ruling that the alienation provision was invalid but maintained on appeal that the circuit court erred in finding the condition that the property continue to be farmed was unenforceable, and if the State failed to farm the property the property would devolve to her and the other residuary beneficiaries.In affirming the lower court's decision, this Court reasoned that although a grantor, under Maryland law, can place conditions and… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
A process account helps explain why Kennedy was willing to invalidate federal law without saying anything, either way, about the constitutional status of state law. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Facts of Granholm v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm
This week the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:09 am
VAT relief only if goods physically move out of member state Regina (Teleos plc and Others) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise “A supply of goods qualified as an intra-Community supply of goods that in principle was exempt from value-added tax only if the goods physically moved from the EC member state of dispatch to the destination state. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
[1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
State of New York (1st Dept., decided 4/29/2010) In Lang v Hanover Ins. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
The post On the right to testify in Graves v US first appeared on Koehler Law. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
In the increasingly heated debate about the state of English privacy law, the courts have frequently been accused of seeking to introduce a privacy law “by the backdoor”. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
United States [Cornell LII Backgrounder; oral arguments transcript; JURIST report] that a private individual can challenge whether a federal criminal law passed to implement an international treaty is valid under the Tenth Amendment [text]. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
In its second opinion of the term, CAAF today reversed the Army CCA in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
