Search for: "M. Williams v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Finally, anyone interested in music or IP at a general level will find this collection fascinating. _________ [1] Williams v Gaye, 895 F (3d) 1106. [2] Hall v Swift, 786 Fed Appx 711 (Mem). [3] Kirbie Johnson, “Olivia Rodrigo, Paramore, and the Murky Tides of Copyright Infringement” Dazed (7 September 2021), online: <dazeddigital.com>. [4] Structured Asset Sales, LLC v Sheeran, 673 F Supp (3d) 415; Daniel Kreps, “Ed Sheeran Wins… [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Switzerland Swiss local reports that the Swiss Federal Court has held that clicking “like” on Facebook on hateful content could amount to a crime United States The US has recently tightened regulations over Chinese state media. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Susan Brenner
As the Court of Appeals noted, United States Secret Service Agent William Slavoski filed a civil rights complaint (pursuant to 42 U.S.Code § 1983) against employees of the Pennsylvania State Police (`PSP’), including Commissioner Frank Pawlowski, Mervin Rodriguez, John Rice, Francis Hacken, Bryon Devlin, Willard Oliphant, Huascar Rivera, and Pedro Rivera (collectively `Defendants’). [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(judgment for alleged assignee of credit card debt reversed and take-nothing judgment rendered)Williams v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
 Pink Cripps is a sweet, crunchy variety of apple developed by crossing the Lady Williams and the Golden Delicious. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]