Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 8,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Appearances matter. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
Dissent/PTO misunderstands significance of control: substantial noise doesn’t reflect a problem w/a survey but w/a real world bias that the survey needed to grapple with. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Turning to the merits of Employer's appeal, the court, citing Matter of Delacruz v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 175 AD3d 1739, noted that "[i]t is well settled that workers' compensation death benefits may not be awarded 'when the injury has been solely occasioned ... by wil[l]ful intention of the injured employee to bring about the injury or death of himself [or herself].'" Further, opined the Appellate Division, "[W]orkers'… [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
Turning to the merits of Employer's appeal, the court, citing Matter of Delacruz v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 175 AD3d 1739, noted that "[i]t is well settled that workers' compensation death benefits may not be awarded 'when the injury has been solely occasioned ... by wil[l]ful intention of the injured employee to bring about the injury or death of himself [or herself].'" Further, opined the Appellate Division, "[W]orkers'… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
According to the Court of Chancery decision in AOL[x], the essence of this guidance is that if the merger price “represents an unhindered, informed, and competitive market valuation” and “(w)here information necessary for participants in the market to make a bid is widely disseminated, and where the terms of the transaction are not structurally prohibitive or unduly limiting to such market participation”, the trial judge must give particular and serious consideration… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
— in California v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
"* Further, as the Appellate Division noted in Matter of Santoro v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
W., The Status of Religion and the Public Benefit in Charity Law. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
"* Further, as the Appellate Division noted in Matter of Santoro v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:36 pm
Smith in Nygard v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:15 am
In Wortham v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:18 am
Kurin, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Galle, Does Mandatory Disclosure Matter? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
In addition, the law faculties of the state of Baden-Württemberg (Heidelberg, Freiburg, Tübingen, Mannheim, Konstanz) are corporate members. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Abrams' opinion in Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Vasquez, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
