Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 5,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
, 2016 SCC 37 (CanLII), [2016] 2 S.C.R. 23, per Wagner J., as he then was, at paras. 35-36, and per Cromwell J. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm
Attorney and AuthorCopyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2018-2019) by Raymond J. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
In a recent paper, Thomas B. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Victor J. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
Technology-Assisted Review Uses (40 Responders – 211 Selections) Chart 6: Survey Responder Overview Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey Overview (40 Responders) Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols (Survey Backgrounder) As defined in The Grossman-Cormack Glossary of Technology-Assisted Review (1), Predictive Coding is an industry-specific term generally used to describe a technology-assisted review process involving the use of a machine learning… [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
However, the Arnold J nonetheless felt it necessarily to submit a reference to the CJEU on the question of the third party market authorization. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael J. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Now it seems to me that there is no First Amendment exception for speech that the judge views as being "born out of a vendetta," or even as "seeking to cause mental distress"; but even to the extent there are exceptions for, say, defamation, or true threats, or perhaps even speech on matters of private concern that's "extreme and outrageous" and intended to cause severe emotional distress, that can't justify an overbroad, categorical "shall… [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:25 am
”[11]Corruption, especially bribery, has become a matter of international concern. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
Victor J. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
The trial court disagreed with this interpretation of R.C. 1308.16(A), and denied class certification for failure to satisfy Civ.R. 23(B)(3)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:13 am
Key Findings Personal saving and investment are necessary for long-term economic growth. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Supreme Court,” 18 J. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Smithers.[68] Dickson J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
Fed.R.Civ.P. 71.1(j). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Thanks to University of Michigan Law School JDs Richard Dancy (2010) and Eric J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
Victor J. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:01 am
The EDPB recognizes that requiring another specific legal ground for secondary use would be contrary to the presumption of compatibility provided by Article 5(1)(b) of the GDPR. [read post]
