Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 12:24 pm
To successfully have pleaded a 2(a) claim, a plaintiff must allege: (1) the defendant’s mark is the same or a close approximation of the name or identity of a person or institution; (2) defendant’s mark would be recognized by purchasers and point uniquely and unmistakably to the person or institution named; (3) that person or institution is not connected to the goods or services under the mark; and (4) such name or identity is of sufficient fame that… [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
- the tricky issue of priority right transfer (T 0725/14) | Everything is awesome: Lego blocks “Lepin” trade mark registration | AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that copyright protection in designs simply arises when they are original | Fordham 27 (Report 14): Priority | Fordham 27 (Report 13): PTAB | “AGING BACKWARDS” for fitness-related goods and services? [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:20 pm
Since the TTAB’s jurisdiction is on issues on registration only, it often looks at three main factors in making a decision: (a) similarity of marks; (b) similarity of goods; and (c) similarity of trade channels. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
It has been suggested that the focus of inquiry in the Restatement project should be on decisions of state courts of last resort (and that overruled cases should be disregarded because they are no longer “good law” which makes eminent sense from the viewpoint of legal practice and appellate advocacy but less so from a more comprehensive view of the evolution of the substance of the law in historical context, which should also pay heed to dissents).The courts of law resort… [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
The private post-purchase control that IoT companies exert over smart goods represents a significant change in private actors’ regulatory capacity to set rules governing knowledge. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:18 am
Moreover, a cancelled registration is not entitled to any of the presumptions of Section 7(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:30 pm
“Motor carriers unit gets underway” (LC)“The story of transportation in the United States,” wrote David Lilienthal, who had studied with Felix Frankfurter at the Harvard Law School in the early 1920s, “has been marked by constant and almost bewildering changes in the facilities by which the movement of men and goods has been effected. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:05 am
A consent is required only if the individual bearing the name in the mark will be associated with the mark as used on the goods or services, either because: (1) the person is so well known that the public would reasonably assume a connection between the person and the goods or services; or (2) the individual is publicly connected with the business in which the mark is used.* * * * * * * * * * * * Precedential No. 10: TTAB Dismisses Rare Section… [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:05 pm
Ben Lovejoy of 9to5Mac reviews the new official Statute of Liberty app, and app which does a good job with augmented reality (AR). [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Bemis.Trade marks Antonella Gentile takes a look to the AG Kokott's Opinion in case C-104/18. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:13 am
C. (2019, May 09). [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:18 am
Mark Cancian will join Merz in discussion. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
As proof that no good deed goes unpunished, Giant Eagle was hit with an award of 1.2 million dollars in punitive damages. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am
Guns, like most goods, can travel. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
The agreement provides that Capital One would allow Houle to purchase goods and services with credit in exchange for payment. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:00 am
The person named by the mark is not connected with the activities performed by the applicant under the mark; and,4. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
With respect to passing off, the plaintiff must establish: (a) reputation of the goods; (b) possibility of deception of the consumer; and (c) likelihood of loss. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:56 am
It ruled that a trademark owner cannot claim for information against an auction portal to disclose information about entities selling goods and about the quantity and prices paid for these goods, as this claim is inconsistent with the Constitution. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
D’s burden: show what shouldn’t be counted, including costs of goods sold. [read post]
