Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 6,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Plaintiff also sought to prevent officers from retaliating against him and others, claiming that an officer had raided the Wiccan locker and seized a book and a cord.In Martin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
(Stay Pending Appeal; Public Interest) Martin v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:35 pm
Martin, 2017 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 2:24 pm
Anyway, Demetri Martin, the great comedian who interviewed me about social network services for The Daily Show last year (video unavailable, of course), did a brilliant sendup of the conflict between Viacom and YouTube. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:10 pm
Clique aqui para acessar os vídeos. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 5:49 pm
The issue was recently addressed by the Eleventh Circuit in Martin v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
On appeal to the Court of Appeal, Martin Howe QC on behalf of Viagogo submitted the new argument that to grant a Norwich Pharmacal order would represent a breach of the alleged wrongdoers’ personal data rights that was neither necessary nor proportionate. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
An action by LB Sullivan (pictured here), an elected Commissioner of the City of Montgomery, Alabama, against the New York Times, for defamation in an advertisement placed by the Committee to Defend Martin Luther King and the Struggle for Freedom in the South (element, above right), therefore failed. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 5:18 am
Chief Judge Martin dissented. [read post]
25 May 2024, 9:11 am
Reid and Pace v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 6:13 am
Martin (230 applied) and Mazur v. eBay (230 didn’t). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Competition and innovation are key ideals in American society, and they were the main focus on March 5, 2014 when the CEOs of SpaceX and United Launch Alliance (“ULA”) testified before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.[1] The ULA, a joint venture between aerospace giants Boeing and Lockheed Martin, currently provides launch services for the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
Martin, 2014 U.S. [read post]
