Search for: "Michaels v State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 13,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:16 pm by Ilya Somin
Roe v Wade [legalizing abortion] was another ... [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 1:52 pm
Mogan has to report the sanctions to the State Bar.All in all, not a great result for him. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, the HSBA Appellate Section hosted a distinguished panel to discuss the United States Supreme Court’s recent healthcare decision, otherwise known as National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:00 pm by R.J. MacReady
Here's a link tomy post when the issue was granted.PD-0493-09, Douglas Michael Hubert v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
  In light of his arguments, Professor O'Hear will likely be pleased with the Seventh Circuit's work today in US v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This 2020, opinion is also from the Southern District, Houston Division, and is styled, Michael Dyll and Remi Dyll v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]